WARNING: DISREGARD ANYTHING THAT COMES OUT OF IOWA CAUCUSES
Special Report by the Creative Youth News Team
December 12, 2007
The exclusion by the Des Moines Register of progressive poll winner Dennis Kucinich from the Register's Iowa Debate is a strong indicator that the debate is an excuse for a coronation and not an opportunity to allow caucus-goers to see the candidates and make an informed decision. Is the fixing being done by the Register, an organization now caught trying to exclude the progressive front-runner for the presidency, or by the Iowa Democratic Party, which is in charge of the caucuses? This is not the first Democratic event in Iowa from which progressive front runner Dennis Kucinich has been excluded. Other exclusionary events thrown by Iowa Democratic Party insiders tend to suggest that there is an agenda for the caucuses. The appearance is that their plan is to use the first-in-the-nation caucuses of 2008 to eliminate any true progressive from the presidential race. Will the caucuses themselves also be rigged with rules preventing the caucus-goers from voting for the progressive front runner? If so, there could be a backlash from primary voters in other states. The winner of the Iowa caucuses may find himself or herself the loser in the primaries of 2008. The Iowa caucus endorsement may have the same effect as Al Gore's 2004 endorsement of Howard Dean. Unlike the caucuses, it is more difficult to fix primaries, and angry voters may say "enough" to the crowned winner of the caucuses of that small state if those caucuses fail to give a fair shot to the national progressive front runner of 2008.
Progressive poll after progressive poll has shown that Dennis Kucinich is the clear frontronner for the progressive vote, winning national polls done by the Nation, Democracy for America (47/50 states) and Progressive Democrats of America (46/50 states). For information on polls establishing Dennis Kucinich as the national progrssive front runner see: http://creativeyouth.net/dkwinspda.html, http://pressmediawire.com/article.cfm?articleID=4148, http://www.dennis4president.com/go/newsroom/democrat-base-gives-kucinich-third-major-win-in-nationwide-poll/.
California Democrats have learned the hard way not to trust caucuses. This year, for the first time, delegates to the Democratic state central committee were chosen in caucuses in their assembly districts. Many of the most progressive potential delegates, who filed to run for state central committee, discovered too late that they had been put on the list in the wrong district or were not put on the list at all, and that only those on the correct lists were allowed to be delegates. In other caucuses, individuals from outside the district showed up in menacing groups for the apparent purpose of preventing progressives from being selected. Individuals who admitted to being Republicans had pretended to be Democrats long enough to vote in the caucuses. In some cases, party insiders were seen stuffing ballot boxes, with the result being that the candidates most caucus-goers supported lost. Where there were two ballot boxes, the candidates elected to the executive board would often lose their delegate seats (required for selection to executive board) due to delegate box tampering. In some cases, the person who got the executive board seat was the third place finisher for that seat, with the first two being disqualified. In some districts, progressives and their supporters were threatened with violence if they attended their caucuses. From comments made by a prominent member of the California Democratic party suspected of being behind the caucus-rigging, it was learned that the true purpose of the caucus charade was to prevent the most liberal delegates from retaining their voice at Democratic Party committee meetings.
It is not the progressive Democrats who will be on trial in Iowa. The Iowa Caucuses, themselves, are on trial. More and more states want to have their primaries at the same time as or before the Iowa Caucuses. Most Democrats support the concept of a national primary. Most expect to see that national primary in 2012 This may be Iowa's last year to go first. The question the public is asking is, do they want to go out on a note of fairness or one of caucus-fixing?
Copyright ©2007 by the Creative Youth News Team. All rights reserved.
Home
The exclusion by the Des Moines Register of progressive poll winner Dennis Kucinich from the Register's Iowa Debate is a strong indicator that the debate is an excuse for a coronation and not an opportunity to allow caucus-goers to see the candidates and make an informed decision. Is the fixing being done by the Register, an organization now caught trying to exclude the progressive front-runner for the presidency, or by the Iowa Democratic Party, which is in charge of the caucuses? This is not the first Democratic event in Iowa from which progressive front runner Dennis Kucinich has been excluded. Other exclusionary events thrown by Iowa Democratic Party insiders tend to suggest that there is an agenda for the caucuses. The appearance is that their plan is to use the first-in-the-nation caucuses of 2008 to eliminate any true progressive from the presidential race. Will the caucuses themselves also be rigged with rules preventing the caucus-goers from voting for the progressive front runner? If so, there could be a backlash from primary voters in other states. The winner of the Iowa caucuses may find himself or herself the loser in the primaries of 2008. The Iowa caucus endorsement may have the same effect as Al Gore's 2004 endorsement of Howard Dean. Unlike the caucuses, it is more difficult to fix primaries, and angry voters may say "enough" to the crowned winner of the caucuses of that small state if those caucuses fail to give a fair shot to the national progressive front runner of 2008.
Progressive poll after progressive poll has shown that Dennis Kucinich is the clear frontronner for the progressive vote, winning national polls done by the Nation, Democracy for America (47/50 states) and Progressive Democrats of America (46/50 states). For information on polls establishing Dennis Kucinich as the national progrssive front runner see: http://creativeyouth.net/dkwinspda.html, http://pressmediawire.com/article.cfm?articleID=4148, http://www.dennis4president.com/go/newsroom/democrat-base-gives-kucinich-third-major-win-in-nationwide-poll/.
California Democrats have learned the hard way not to trust caucuses. This year, for the first time, delegates to the Democratic state central committee were chosen in caucuses in their assembly districts. Many of the most progressive potential delegates, who filed to run for state central committee, discovered too late that they had been put on the list in the wrong district or were not put on the list at all, and that only those on the correct lists were allowed to be delegates. In other caucuses, individuals from outside the district showed up in menacing groups for the apparent purpose of preventing progressives from being selected. Individuals who admitted to being Republicans had pretended to be Democrats long enough to vote in the caucuses. In some cases, party insiders were seen stuffing ballot boxes, with the result being that the candidates most caucus-goers supported lost. Where there were two ballot boxes, the candidates elected to the executive board would often lose their delegate seats (required for selection to executive board) due to delegate box tampering. In some cases, the person who got the executive board seat was the third place finisher for that seat, with the first two being disqualified. In some districts, progressives and their supporters were threatened with violence if they attended their caucuses. From comments made by a prominent member of the California Democratic party suspected of being behind the caucus-rigging, it was learned that the true purpose of the caucus charade was to prevent the most liberal delegates from retaining their voice at Democratic Party committee meetings.
It is not the progressive Democrats who will be on trial in Iowa. The Iowa Caucuses, themselves, are on trial. More and more states want to have their primaries at the same time as or before the Iowa Caucuses. Most Democrats support the concept of a national primary. Most expect to see that national primary in 2012 This may be Iowa's last year to go first. The question the public is asking is, do they want to go out on a note of fairness or one of caucus-fixing?
Copyright ©2007 by the Creative Youth News Team. All rights reserved.
Home